Mentor Project

Power Broker Mentor Project


Psychology *
Philosophy
Physics
Politics
[original 7-24-14]






* 7-28-14 Technical glitches lost the first run at this. Here is the 2nd still under construction.
By intention there are two runs at Physics.  Di-Spencering with 4mat dot dot dot?


Rough Clearing House of Disciplines? 
Philosophy: Giroux
Physics: Gravity
Politics: OW
Go to *
[Pardon my spaciousness- Apparent Browser Anomaly]
















7-30-14 More Triadic Referrals.

FOOTNOTES PAGE January 2016 (page 1)

De~men~shun~alism[!]

Bohemian gravity!

Bohemian~INET*, Quid Pro Physics , A universe of 4 di-men shuns[!] ,Father, Son, ,  Meta4 V 4D, Chez V (slash) 4D , Wittgenstein ,

Gravitas~ Satire is not a two way street., 4Mat , Footnotes Page December 2014(Page One) , Way, Too Point Oh? , Or ask for a third , Funneling Crisis?

* compactified?

The catch may be in the fold.  The pun is in the journalism.  The trick or narrative may be in the math and physics.  The point is: what is a dimension?  Not to mention: what is a point?  A point may represent a perspective in space as well as what it may represent in view of the perspective.  A point has no dimension.  Two points represent 1 dimension or a line.   Three non-linear points determine a plane or represent 2 dimensions.  Four non-planar points, require 3 dimensions and represent volume or space.  But dimensions are one level below the point. 

Time is often referred to as the 4th dimension.  But returning to a point as representing no dimensions, 4 points equilaterally spaced require 3 dimensions (x, y & z).

1-23-16 Overton Perspectivism {perspectivalism: x, y, z}

I.Q.* (draft)

*pre-dated
Isolation
Quarantine
~~~
M O W / spring: A.  B.  Tin Foil Herman
~ : Speculative Physics

Speculative Physics

MOW + cheese

W.

Red Bull...

 I.Q. (2.0) (10-29-14)
~~~~~~~~~~~
Information
Quotient
conflation / inflation ? [!]

 

 

The Hood? ... ?

[The aves, and the aveknots or avenauts.]

Mitt's BO*Son

Not to get too physicsCal,
but the Mitt Flop of mass theory is Political.
Is it the Tetrahedron of Won't or Wont?

Share ’N Angle
Issa Coverup Committee
Cain TV
Rance Priebus


The Devo Incar-n8?

You do the math.
Or Revoo due the math !

Why is Raw Money a uniter not a divider, because they can't do the math. 
[Ctrl F Intents Post B.S.]

* past particle pun

[7-10-12 Pardon my pun getting lost in the physics, boss. 
Speaking of bookin'** or book ends.***]

 ** tan gent (or ge oh me try***)
*** not gun a go there
[but Kan'T : A Brief Incite?]
[I may have smoothed the edges of my pairaGone.]
[Speaking of NOW: DWS "Class Act" What about capital gains? People v. R-Money. (Share 'n Angle v. Robbin' Hood)  Those poor 1,2,3%!]
[NTM: Jansing &Co.][CW: Caricature Writer @DWS.cc]
[P. S.]

The Physics of the DOW

Cap^ and Trade* Mark[!]

^ not there yet
* TheTao of Physics
[!] the twain of Hegelianism

Not to pun on "Do Obama's Way", but a more dimensional perspective on Chemicals and Markets. (FP1b)

[!] to say that spirit/matters^ not Hegel per Say.

[Retrieve from Draft]

^  High8US (Knot too Say)

(Re:Labels and Images)

Not to lean over or tilt the machine:
 


Retrieved from Draft 12-18-13

Confession: No pun intended.

 In regards to the Tetrahedron of Everything, I may need to give credit to Ken Wilber.  While I was not aware of it at the time, and I had recovered it base on earlier work of mine(i.e. a reading of Plato’s Republic), I may need to give him credit for it.  Even to the point of unconsciously stealing it lock, stock and barrel.  Alternatively it is a case of synchronicity* but it turns out, he had a late night radio program from 1973 to 1982 about such “new age” matters.  This coincides with a period I worked mostly graveyard shifts and had access to a radio.  I recovered this not only through Plato other fields of study.  Only thanks to a  question to Meta AI did I discover that he had the same disciplines on the vertices of the tetrahedron.  They are Physics, Psychology, Philosophy and Politics.  HOWEVER: while this has not been run through AI even for cleanup, in a quick search I could not find the sources for what AI had given me on another device.    

A more comprehensive search (who came up with the Tetrahedron of Everything Physics, Psychology, Philosophy and Politics.) does not find what I have on my other device either.  But it does remind me to credit Buckminster Fuller who I saw speak at our high school in the early 70’s. Then there is Milo Wolfe who I can not place on the timeline of this process.  More credit to be processed.

https://youtu.be/bc5V_YXvGC8   This has not been viewed yet, but shows four people I have studied.  Three of them in one class.  “Marx, Nietzsche, Freud” and Einstein an early publication.  Sometime in the early 70’s I read the book, Man and his Symbols by Joseph Campbell, with a forward by Carl Jung.

* Update: I have found that Wilbur had not mentioned it until his book in 1995. Which I did not read or have.

5-9-26  However Arthur Youg mentioned a Tetrahedron of Will in 1976>

The Be All and End All?

NOT[!] *
Nor,
Neither.

Not to trammel up the consequences,
but "Peace is hard work"
and so are economics and progress.
Not to catch up on the gaming metaphor either.

(See Tax Plan and "Fiscal Terrorism")
Not to mention actual tables.

[ T. O. W.]
Politics ---> Economics, Government, Religion (Values)
Philosophy -
Psychology -
Physics ---> Math, Meaning, Forces(Ge Oh Me Try)***

Leaving aside the dynamics of philosophy and psychology, the internal and external dynamics of thoughts and feelings should be noted.
Also note difference between theories and models,
not to mention** formulay.

* note irony puncutation [!] in regard to the INET dicussion of models in the context of "Moneyball" and the Bard.(next two links) But more importantly in the context of the Platonic system, which I call the Tetrahedron of Will(TOW).
** Or KOW TOW
*** not just to pun but physics is the base and politics the pinnacle in this GPS of whose will and what will happen.

[Update: 7-10-13 hilites added also labels(INET/The Last Word)

FOOTNOTES MARCH 2013

3-14-13 : interesting digs Six Links
(b.s.) "S.E.(vi)" A. (fn)FOR D... , B. i.e. S.E. (vi) edgy , C. ROW MAN #Sign [Numeral (i)]. 
(b.s.) "Six Sigma" A. No Frackin' Way (sc) ... E. Rocket Man?[!] ... I. Over Helming. (sc).
un M bed Ed (sc) ?[!] {?}

3-18-13:  Not to leave it, or pun on SNL: nor love it.  R we LOL in the same boat? As for Heading
*: dimentionalism(sic) -
lede : (b.s.)tetra+heed+run - A.,B.,C.,D.,G.,H.,I.
or : (b.s.) lede+or+ship - A., ... . N. Walking the Plank[!] (s.c.)
ship : (b.s.) share+n+angle -
? : (b.s.) tetrahedron of will -
focus : (b.s.) Hume  A. Third Times a Charm. B. He said *a fowl*!
on :  (b.s.) Hume+or+us  / Humorism
Pythagorean : Pythagorean - A Place to Ponder
Socratic :  Socratics. - (b.s.)Kant+Hegel
published today 3-18-13

3-20-13 Curve Balls?  (b.s.)Curve+Balls: A., B., C., D. /  Original Intent and Spin.

3-22-13  Scroll over, and only "Physics" had been read at time of post. Post Physics? / Un Try
Angles? 

3-28-13 Absolut(ist)ly - "clothing" (b.s.)robin+hood: RawMoney Runnin', Genre Clash (sc),  Fair and Balanced... (sc) / divide**: At what point is (pun and rap on justice/scales and founding docs) / "absolutist"(b.s.)absolutism : At what point is , Primary Boogeyman.  / win or lose (b.s.)former(pop+culture): A.(sc), B., C., D., E., F., G., Slash Segue(sc), The Billy Club...(sc), A generous dia-Gnosis.(sc).,  FAUX CULTIAN? (sc), Close Enough for(sc),  Pluto, Plato, and the Pen Dull'em, M(m)., N(n), Pluto, Plato, and the Pen Dull'em, P., Q.(q).  latter (b.s.)boogeyman: Primary Boogeyman, B., C., Bottom Line Update(sc), Juxta-Boogey (sc)
VFW:Virtue Freedom War?  Rhetoric, Logic, Grammar ? [!]

Notes from Al-Qaeda

"The Base" a translation: "Al-Qaeda"
Actually these are just notes from June 1, 2007

The Base: Al-Qaeda
The Bottom Line: The people.
Fundamentalists: Neo-Cons

Connections? People need to be the bottom line not money. The point needs to be progress not money. Money is a tool that is needed for survival. It is not the point of it all. The same goes for power. The point of the base which Bush brought together is their view from the top, to heck with the people getting there. The same goes for their thinking, starting at the end and expecting to get somewhere else.

Note: that now I have just found a post from someone with the same title. The Base

NOTES FROM TODAY:
People Matter

A paradigm is a worldview. This is a base world view that covers everything. First there is Physics which covers the reality as we know it, and don’t know it. Then there is Psychology which is the reality as we don’t know it, unless we think about it and then we still don’t know but feel something. Then there is Philosophy which covers the reality as we know it and would be nothing without us. [8-6-07: The Physics, Psychology, and Philosophy seem to be in evolutionary order, and in existence, feeling and thinking seemed to be the order of interactions. Society or Reality as these three interact seem to be embodied in the culture that is created, which can be for or against... Justice.]

These are the primary fields which form the fourth field which depends on time and the dynamics of the other three which each depend on the other three. The only other dimension in my mind is the direction these vectors can take which are either progress or back again which is a quality of the forces on each vector. But we cannot go home again. Even the second two vectors require our presence, so the direction seems to be aimed by and for us. Which puts people and progress as the primary matters of concern, or the alternative is only the return.

Now if this is a little over your head or seems loopy, you get a little more than you know. If this seems obvious you know a little more than you think. But if you could care less, that matters too.

Now for the less obvious. Just because I read, The Base , does not mean I read all of Asimov's The Foundation Series but there are connections: numbers and Psycho-History. Numbers matter and he's got them wrong; the writer of The Base, not The Foundation Series.

Condescending note: the difference between the president and congress and their polling numbers is that congress has more than one view point, and the president has only one. He may have it on many matters, but if things are black and white, all you have to do is flip flop and choose, between the the 32% (now 29%) who support Bush and the many Candidates who will run from him but not his policies are the balance of power the 68% who if they were united would probably go down in history. The miserable ratings of congress are because there are so many alternatives to Bush's stay the course, and that numbers are divided and low because they are not resisting him enough let alone sort out their options. alternatives.

And another earlier note revisited.
David Horsey wrote a piece in May of 2002, on Red and Blue America: my reply was apparently over someones head as a main point was blurred. The green was removed for color in the bottom line. In other words, the editor replaced one word (green) with another (color).

Horsey's cartoon goes overboard on voters

At the risk of being obvious, I would like to comment on David Horsey's "Red & Blue America" (May 19). For the sake of humor, it went overboard in its characterizations of those who voted for George W. Bush or Al Gore. I hope it is a good thing if people realize, like I did, how we can see one side funnier or less overboard than the other.

I hope the humor can be less dividing than the colors pinned on Gore and Bush. It also made me realize that there may be value in using more colors, but somehow without color being a factor in making us see red.

So at the risk of being obvious again, I will give you my original bottom line.
"It also made me realize that there may be value in using more colors, but somehow without green being a factor in making us see red.

Bold added, and at the risk of further condescension, green means money and third parties in general, not that they should not unite rather than divide. OK, I could not even keep the condescension up.

OK, I am not sure about that last double negative or even if it is, but...
The point is the difficulty in uniting, when we insist on black and white, or even red, white and blue, not to mention what we neglect, but the consequences are the result.

We have met the enemy and he is us. Well we should check the roots of this, but it seems we are the solution as well.

Reality is the 4D.

[Rough Draft 6-3-14]

The politics of nature.
X, Y & Z R physics, psychology & philosophy.
Each an acronimble player[!]*

*to parse disciplines & unfuzz math/logic.

~~~
Edited 6-4-14 [!]

The fourth dimention is politics, in the pantheon of disciplines. 
A. Physics
B. Psychology
C. Philosophy
D. Politics

X, Y and Z, plus time are the four dimensions in 4 moolah shun.
Spoiler alert:  The fifth element ?**

** not exactly

F'N 3

Update Labels.
My Images: Review of Recent
Gitmo or less.(HeGel Try Angle), 

 

Ear Rock, Ear Ron,(Subjective/Objective d'ow) 

Change Logos (RYGB)DeltaLogos(Economics, Hume, Or us, Politics)

Ghost Busters (4TetraHedrons)
Speculative Physics (Original 4-sided-die.)(Not my Maslow)
Wittgenstein (Secondary Die?)

Secondary Edgy's 
The Physics of the DOW
Rough Philosophy (Venn History)
On any given day? 3Models(Environment)~
A Place To Ponder 3Models(Environment)~
Bricks and stones (Politics, Economics, Religion, Culture)~

*

Pre-Capitalization

(fn)TOO Point OH[!] (Politics, Economics, Religion, Culture)~

~
* uncertain of origional insert (found in image archive)
Feels Like Tetra Spirit [!]

#1 Discipline - Philosophy

Philosophy should be the top priority for the Democrats!
It is the top priority for the Neo-Cons
and the Republicans are all too disciplined.

Philosophy is just one discipline.
Discipline is not the only philosophy.
Their philosophy is just "offensive".
Our philosophy must be "everything matters".

Not just more discipline, but more disciplines
as in "law" and "politics" "Get No Respect" as Rodney Dangerfield said.
And as I have said, hence the dangerfield we are in.

War is a "last resort", but does the President still have the "war powers" which congress gave him to fight "terrorism"?
His philosophy is that his word is the exception to every rule.

The other two points of THE POWER BROKER MOUNTAIN PROJECT,
may be Physics and Psychology [*].


These should be the next two priorities, which should focus on what goes on in the world and what goes on in peoples minds,
besides the philosophy that "We are No. 1" for each and every one of us. But it must be noted how much science is devalued, at least in getting it together. Of course we know what physics has brought us in terms of the nuclear age, but the matter of which came first is still a head game.

Where does this fit into the current affairs? Some might say, it is the "Power of Intention" but it starts with trying to determine what other's intentions are while devaluing what our own intentions are or should be.

[any links will be added in due course]
[italics are additions, and bolds are for emphasis, and minor editing within 10 minutes of original post]

The above is not based on a reading of the following... yet!

The Next Act By Seymour M. Hersh Iran? Syria? [update here  ]

Kristol: ‘We Could Be In A Military Confrontation With Iran Much Sooner Than People Expect’

These are just two links,
that are yet to be read by me.
HAVE YOU? - - NO MATTER,
if you can process and address the rest of the above.

For deeper matters see these two organizations;Center for American Progress
and
just foreign policy

[* UPDATE 04-08-08: pinnacle or tetrahedron to be added phoney or funny to political points ] as in
[1. Physical
2. Psychological
3. Philosophical
4. Political
(power loop of phony and funny or what will happen)
Hence the battle over not just temper but meant and there4 humor's another battle field, not counting Dangerfield.]

Presidential SOTU

Huffington On Bipartisanship *.-Text-
PBS Annotated SOTU text/video
GOP Responds to SOTU
and promoteown solutions.
Oh, it's the economy(brainy)! -Newsweek**

My summary of SOTU: Heavy on hope, light on hype.

My reply to response: It was "fair and balanced" and with less rhetoric almost a Blue Dog, and with better facts almost a someone that could work across the aisle. Talk is cheap and hype costly. Hope is very economical, but progress takes investment.

* It seems that the following is very odd(my bold):

Sen. Jon Kyl (R-Ariz.), the second most powerful Republican in the Senate, was just as blunt and brutal. "It was a campaign speech," he said. "I thought it was a very partisan speech. He did not help himself with Republicans tonight. You do not bash the opposition and then encourage them to work with you."

How, specifically, did he bash?

"Every third paragraph was complaining about the mess that George Bush got him in. He didn't mention the words George Bush but he didn't have to," said Kyl. "After more than a year, take ownership of the problems you have. You campaigned for president to solve these problems so stop complaining about the mess that you inherited. That was okay for a few weeks or a few months, but after awhile it gets a little tiresome."

Kyl went on to complain about "thinly veiled suggestions that all Republicans do is say 'no,' that we have to stop saying 'no' to everything. That's not the way to encourage productive cooperation with the other side."

Especially as it continues:

Was he offended by the shot at skeptic(sic) of the science behind climate change?

"Well, he probably meant it as such, but frankly I didn't receive it as such, since I'm one of the skeptics," he said.

Anything else?

"He started out talking about the constitutional requirement to report on the state of the union and in the very first part of the speech he did. And then he veered off of it and got into this big campaign mantra, which just isn't done. I know this is his first one, but still, it shouldn't be so much about him, and how he didn't come here to do this and he didn't come here to do that and he's going to fight on and so on. It's not about that. It's about the American people and how you're going to react to what they've been telling you -- or trying to tell you -- about what they'd like to see done."

I thought that was pretty much what President Obama did, and it seems odd if not forced that this Republican take makes any sense. Of course they believe in an invisible force (Ctrl F hand) not to mention freedom as a force, which is even less accurate.(just speaking economics and physics). It seems that MassAChooseIts independents, moderates, democrats, and apparently the Senate's #2 Republican has given the president a mandate. Now congress, "may the force** be with you".

BTW: we don't have to worry about deficits anymore**, there is no looking back and it is the President's economy.

footnote:
asterisk * is post I am commenting on
asterisk ** refers back to preemptive crack and source(Newsweek/YouTube)
But seriously.
*** see comment 3 of more there re: change agent

[UPDATE: On Thom Hartmann, Congressman Blumenauer suggests Valentines for the Senate (Valentines are the broken parts of the bills that need passing. Progressively: ping pong, reconciliation, nuclear option, Valentines [*] . Seemingly how I put it[**] & within the mechanics of the process and politics.)]
[*] 1-29-10 link to Valentines for the Senate
[**] The Nature of Things (posted 1-20-10) also "up, down, or side ways" not to mention the Mass A Choose Its Dilemma. Make it so! May the force be with you.[Is there a Mass A Choose Its Lesson?]

First Sources

It is a beautiful Monday, Stephanie Miller is on the radio. France attempts a turn from austerity.^^
[Really... Click on in"F"ables(see**) at your own risk.]
Guest Eric Boehler of Media Matters and other* in"F"ables.**
President Obama takes his gloves off*** and Ron Paul is another matter.
Not[!][?]

*killing 2brds with one asterisk (the "other" link has nothing to do with Stephanie Miller)
But the next link is not for the Right thinking.
** More than you might want to hear by Live Free Funny or Die.
Scroll over for insufficient warning.
*** First Read (two videos) Framing 2012

Note [?] @Not[!] = Churned Media
[Winning?  Backward? Mitt-Flop ?  (see two videos ***)]
[Not^ the bottom line! (see comments/hints)NFRY]

^confidence fairies ?

[Not such a large leap?!] Knot! Really it is.
^^ L8 link

Update: 5-8-12 Martin Bashir
Ed Schultz on Mitt Flop [!][?] Really! Really? And Lastly.

5-9-12 Charles Johnson
One person's Mitt-Flop ~ is another's Physics~ of Nuance.
~ Duality / Noncausality

Work in progress…

 …a self reference as well as the situation of this process.  

Open Letter  The First page of this blog.

#1 Discipline   The first Vertex of my Model.

The Hit and Run Gang.  The 4 vertices Of the model.

Speculative Physics. The first use of the tetrahedron.

Awkward Segue: Ted Kennedy, R.I.P.

---
Are you talking about me?
..or the Republicans (tongue in cheek).
[This potential post including the title evolved in my head yesterday.** ]
---
[Original title: Winding Down / Cracking Up.]

---
[THE DREAM SHALL NEVER DIE *]
---

AWKWARD SEGUE:
May Senator Ted Kennedy "Rest in Peace" with the potential success of health care reform. He now has the potential to role in his grave at the Republican comments in my first link.

Return to normal programming? My apologies for making light or political calculus(or physics) of the passing of an icon. It seems the Republicans lifted a preemptive glass of whine, and it is time for the Democrats get the bread out. I did not want to break or cast it...metaphorically.

[Post post mourning Steve Clemons: my heart goes out to those closer to him.]

*last update/edit
** timing clarified 8-28-09 (italics here and there)

Update: Fight On!

Fight On!
Pun on Thom!

Meanwhile, Updates are not logged in:
Corporate Profiling?
Is it the Lorenz Lens?

4-11-12 SCOTUS update.

Develop(ed) image to include:

Physics, Psychology, Philosophy, and with Politics at the center, or top, depending on how***you spin it.

Preemptive Veep? MoJo. (Ouch) No I don't think that the host of Morning Joe may be a Republican Veep Candidate, but it might be a good suggestion. What I mean by MoJo is that they may pick a Joe Biden like* candidate. Of course that might be too broad a generalization, I mean someone with legislative experience, of which Paul Ryan, Rick Santorum, or Newt Gingrich might fit, but I mean an other-than-Romney type. But who am I to endorse** a Republican?

* not that I believe in ideological contrast.

** with a lemon twist

*** Righteous Tangent [!]

P.S. (Pre-Selection: Romney/Ryan 2012)

Neo-changian?

Naturally Evolving Order !

2-24-15 BIN~GO[!]
A fifth dimention or shun*. See (e,r,s)

C-BIN: Neo-con Pope?  Saint maybe, you can't have a dead Pope, but it would be more convenient.
Not to mention RE:cc(card carrying; Nietzsche?)  Methane?(~)

(~) wordplay @"BIN" especially :50 mark.  Eggs in one hen?

FP here{in one}.
(egg,road, sky: a. FP4 SEPT 2014 , b. Work in Progress , c. Egg/Road/Sky* , d. Speculative Physics )
Self- anomaly
St. Maybe[!]  Rooting^ for Strauss[?]

^Pla(N)tonic(~)
*  Forward (Ironically) (S~hun~T[!])
??? 

Two-wrongs don't mean a Left[!]

Too reads do not mean a dialogue. 

Mid-read(NFRY): (i.e. live footnoting)
Survival of the fittest verses(~) corporate species and arms races[!]
Battle of the Narratives? (Corporate offspring, peacocks and elk.)
(head or tails not treated equally, but...)[somewhat akin to gander or goose?]
[fundamental try-vergence]...(grain v ladder)[LOL read v regulations]
Survival of the Narratives?

4-3-16 to read:
The Atlantic: Obama Doctrine
4-4-16
Hedges/Hudson on Neo-Liberal Economics.

[related (b.s.): Spencer... demo/mice...DecomPart * Meantalizing]
*Moline's Platonics  / Darwinian Physics

Heuristic Concurrence and

Hermeneutics *or

plane fecundity.

* knot (5th D)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heuristic
http://www.thefreedictionary.com/concurrence
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hermeneutics

Math is next to Godliness, geometry agnostic** to physics.[!]


** [!] i.e. to sort or transcend later
From the principles or tri angle(tan gent)lations or field works. The 4thD = a. Time b. Perpendicular c. E=mcHammer***  d. Tangent to eachGe. (4 mu lations)

*** two inserts 9-24 (@ later & Hammer) also Re: * Knot to go on, but more on 4 mu lations/=/"action of bringing or proposing"